Academics Institute Performance Academic Rules & Regulations Institute Manual – OBE Project Based Learning (PBL) Academic Calendar AICTE Learning Resources Syllabus IQAC / ICIU / IAMC Feedback CIAAN Norms Zeal TVC Student Feedback (Academics) Student Feedback (Facilities) Faculty Feedback Student Feedback (Academics) Student Details Department—Please choose an option—AI & Machine LearningAutomation & RoboticsComputer EngineeringElectronics & CommunicationCivil EngineeringMechanical EngineeringElectrical Engineering Academic Year—Please choose an option—2024-25 Semester—Please choose an option—Odd SemEven Sem Class—Please choose an option—First YearSecond YearThird Year Please provide the feedback in the range 1(Min.) to 5(Max.) Student Feedback 1. How much of the syllabus was covered in the class? (85-100%-5, 70-84%-4,55-69%-3,30-54%-2,Below 30%-1) 12345 2. How well teachers prepare for the classes, domain knowledge & presentation skills? 12345 3. Teacher was punctual and started classes on regular time 12345 4. How well were the teachers able to communicate and his ability to solve doubts of students? 12345 5. Teachers inform you about your expected competencies, course outcomes and programme outcomes. 12345 6. The teachers illustrate the concepts through examples and applications. 12345 7. The teachers identify your strengths and encourage you with providing right level of challenges. & Teachers are able to identify your weaknesses and help you to overcome them. 12345 8. The institution makes effort to engage students in the monitoring, review and continuous quality improvement of the teaching learning process. 12345 9. The institute takes active interest in promoting internship, student exchange, field visit opportunities for students. 12345 10. “Efforts are made by the institute/ teachers to inculcate soft skills, life skills and employability skills to make you ready for the world of work.” 12345 11. Effective use of ICT tools such as LCD projector, Multimedia, etc. while teaching 12345 12. The overall quality of teaching-learning process in your institute 12345 Recommendations for course improvement (Please specify topics that should be added/dropped from the course, new books to be recommended, changes in teaching scheme and experiments, etc. if any) 11+4=? Student Feedback (Facilities) Student Details Department—Please choose an option—AI & Machine LearningAutomation & RoboticsComputer EngineeringElectronics & CommunicationCivil EngineeringMechanical EngineeringElectrical Engineering Academic Year—Please choose an option—2024-25 Semester—Please choose an option—Odd SemEven Sem Class—Please choose an option—First YearSecond YearThird Year Please provide the feedback in the range 1(Min.) to 5(Max.) Curricular Based 1. Classroom, Laboratories, Workshop & Computer Center-Space, Cleanliness & Ambience 12345 2. Laboratory Equipment, Safety & Security Facilities 12345 3. Availability of Reading Materials , New Publications and Periodicals, Library Services & Management 12345 4. Internet, Wi-Fi, Online Exam, ICT & Pedagogic Facilities 12345 5. E-Learning and Digital Learning Facilities (Digital Library) & Reprography 12345 Co-Curricular Based 1. Industry Supported/Sponsored Laboratories, Innovation/Incubation Center 12345 2. Student Training Program, Workshops, Seminars, Guest Lecture, Industrial Visit, PBL Support & Services 12345 3. Training & Placement facilities & Career Support Services 12345 4. Professional/Technical Societies/Chapters, Students Clubs Services 12345 5. Industrial Internships, Project Support with Industry Connect 12345 Extra-Curricular Based 1. Sports-Outdoor, Indoor Games facilities, Coaching & Sports Materials in Gymkhana 12345 2. Technical Skill Development Activities, Gymnasium, Yoga & Meditation Facilities 12345 3. Soft Skill and Personality Development Services, Professional Development Activities and EDC Activities 12345 4. Cultural Club Activities, Contests, Presentations, Hackathons Support, Services & Facilities 12345 5. Social Services(NSS/YRC/ RRC)& Community Engagement Support, Services & Facilities 12345 General 1. Stationary, Stores, Lift, Safety, Security, CCTV Facilities 12345 2. Canteen/Hostel-Facilities & House Keeping, Boys/ Girls Common Room & Recreation 12345 3. Student Counselling/Mentoring, Grievance Redressal Services , Medical Facility & Public/College Transportation 12345 4. Management, Support and Services from Admin Sections (Student, Examination, Scholarship and Accounts) 12345 5. Tree-Plantation, Landscape, Auditorium, Safe Drinking Water 12345 Recommendations for course improvement (Please specify topics that should be added/dropped from the course, new books to be recommended, changes in teaching scheme and experiments, etc. if any) 11+4=? Faculty Feedback Faculty Details Department—Please choose an option—AI & Machine LearningAutomation & RoboticsComputer EngineeringElectronics & CommunicationCivil EngineeringMechanical EngineeringElectrical EngineeringScience & Humanities Academic Year—Please choose an option—2024-25 Semester—Please choose an option—Odd SemEven Sem Please provide the feedback in the range 1(Min.) to 5(Max.) Faculty Feedback 1. Aims and objectives of the syllabi are well defined and clear to teachers and students. Strongly AgreeAgreeNot SureDisagreeStrongly Disagree 2. The curriculum provides opportunity for the conducting project related activities. Strongly AgreeAgreeNot SureDisagreeStrongly Disagree 3. The depth of the course content is adequate to have significant learning outcomes. Strongly AgreeAgreeNot SureDisagreeStrongly Disagree 4. The opinion of the faculty members are taken in to account during curriculum revision. Strongly AgreeAgreeNot SureDisagreeStrongly Disagree 5. The learning outcomes of the curriculum are of local, national and global standard. Strongly AgreeAgreeNot SureDisagreeStrongly Disagree 6. The pre-requisite courses are appropriate for this course. Strongly AgreeAgreeNot SureDisagreeStrongly Disagree 7. The students attain the POs, COs and PSOs satisfactorily. Strongly AgreeAgreeNot SureDisagreeStrongly Disagree 8. The curriculum has the potential in developing the habit of self learning among the students. Strongly AgreeAgreeNot SureDisagreeStrongly Disagree 9. The course/syllabus has a good balance between theory and Laboratory-work. Strongly AgreeAgreeNot SureDisagreeStrongly Disagree 10. Evaluation of the course is appropriate to discriminate the students. Strongly AgreeAgreeNot SureDisagreeStrongly Disagree Recommendations for course improvement (Please specify topics that should be added/dropped from the course, new books to be recommended, changes in teaching scheme and experiments, etc. if any) 11+4=? Student Feedback (Academics) Student Details Department—Please choose an option—AI & Machine LearningAutomation & RoboticsComputer EngineeringElectronics & CommunicationCivil EngineeringMechanical EngineeringElectrical Engineering Academic Year—Please choose an option—2024-25 Semester—Please choose an option—Odd SemEven Sem Class—Please choose an option—First YearSecond YearThird Year Please provide the feedback in the range 1(Min.) to 5(Max.) Student Feedback 1. How much of the syllabus was covered in the class? (85-100%-5, 70-84%-4,55-69%-3,30-54%-2,Below 30%-1) 12345 2. How well teachers prepare for the classes, domain knowledge & presentation skills? 12345 3. Teacher was punctual and started classes on regular time 12345 4. How well were the teachers able to communicate and his ability to solve doubts of students? 12345 5. Teachers inform you about your expected competencies, course outcomes and programme outcomes. 12345 6. The teachers illustrate the concepts through examples and applications. 12345 7. The teachers identify your strengths and encourage you with providing right level of challenges. & Teachers are able to identify your weaknesses and help you to overcome them. 12345 8. The institution makes effort to engage students in the monitoring, review and continuous quality improvement of the teaching learning process. 12345 9. The institute takes active interest in promoting internship, student exchange, field visit opportunities for students. 12345 10. “Efforts are made by the institute/ teachers to inculcate soft skills, life skills and employability skills to make you ready for the world of work.” 12345 11. Effective use of ICT tools such as LCD projector, Multimedia, etc. while teaching 12345 12. The overall quality of teaching-learning process in your institute 12345 Recommendations for course improvement (Please specify topics that should be added/dropped from the course, new books to be recommended, changes in teaching scheme and experiments, etc. if any) 11+4=? Student Feedback (Facilities) Student Details Department—Please choose an option—AI & Machine LearningAutomation & RoboticsComputer EngineeringElectronics & CommunicationCivil EngineeringMechanical EngineeringElectrical Engineering Academic Year—Please choose an option—2024-25 Semester—Please choose an option—Odd SemEven Sem Class—Please choose an option—First YearSecond YearThird Year Please provide the feedback in the range 1(Min.) to 5(Max.) Curricular Based 1. Classroom, Laboratories, Workshop & Computer Center-Space, Cleanliness & Ambience 12345 2. Laboratory Equipment, Safety & Security Facilities 12345 3. Availability of Reading Materials , New Publications and Periodicals, Library Services & Management 12345 4. Internet, Wi-Fi, Online Exam, ICT & Pedagogic Facilities 12345 5. E-Learning and Digital Learning Facilities (Digital Library) & Reprography 12345 Co-Curricular Based 1. Industry Supported/Sponsored Laboratories, Innovation/Incubation Center 12345 2. Student Training Program, Workshops, Seminars, Guest Lecture, Industrial Visit, PBL Support & Services 12345 3. Training & Placement facilities & Career Support Services 12345 4. Professional/Technical Societies/Chapters, Students Clubs Services 12345 5. Industrial Internships, Project Support with Industry Connect 12345 Extra-Curricular Based 1. Sports-Outdoor, Indoor Games facilities, Coaching & Sports Materials in Gymkhana 12345 2. Technical Skill Development Activities, Gymnasium, Yoga & Meditation Facilities 12345 3. Soft Skill and Personality Development Services, Professional Development Activities and EDC Activities 12345 4. Cultural Club Activities, Contests, Presentations, Hackathons Support, Services & Facilities 12345 5. Social Services(NSS/YRC/ RRC)& Community Engagement Support, Services & Facilities 12345 General 1. Stationary, Stores, Lift, Safety, Security, CCTV Facilities 12345 2. Canteen/Hostel-Facilities & House Keeping, Boys/ Girls Common Room & Recreation 12345 3. Student Counselling/Mentoring, Grievance Redressal Services , Medical Facility & Public/College Transportation 12345 4. Management, Support and Services from Admin Sections (Student, Examination, Scholarship and Accounts) 12345 5. Tree-Plantation, Landscape, Auditorium, Safe Drinking Water 12345 Recommendations for course improvement (Please specify topics that should be added/dropped from the course, new books to be recommended, changes in teaching scheme and experiments, etc. if any) 11+4=? Faculty Feedback Faculty Details Department—Please choose an option—AI & Machine LearningAutomation & RoboticsComputer EngineeringElectronics & CommunicationCivil EngineeringMechanical EngineeringElectrical EngineeringScience & Humanities Academic Year—Please choose an option—2024-25 Semester—Please choose an option—Odd SemEven Sem Please provide the feedback in the range 1(Min.) to 5(Max.) Faculty Feedback 1. Aims and objectives of the syllabi are well defined and clear to teachers and students. Strongly AgreeAgreeNot SureDisagreeStrongly Disagree 2. The curriculum provides opportunity for the conducting project related activities. Strongly AgreeAgreeNot SureDisagreeStrongly Disagree 3. The depth of the course content is adequate to have significant learning outcomes. Strongly AgreeAgreeNot SureDisagreeStrongly Disagree 4. The opinion of the faculty members are taken in to account during curriculum revision. Strongly AgreeAgreeNot SureDisagreeStrongly Disagree 5. The learning outcomes of the curriculum are of local, national and global standard. Strongly AgreeAgreeNot SureDisagreeStrongly Disagree 6. The pre-requisite courses are appropriate for this course. Strongly AgreeAgreeNot SureDisagreeStrongly Disagree 7. The students attain the POs, COs and PSOs satisfactorily. Strongly AgreeAgreeNot SureDisagreeStrongly Disagree 8. The curriculum has the potential in developing the habit of self learning among the students. Strongly AgreeAgreeNot SureDisagreeStrongly Disagree 9. The course/syllabus has a good balance between theory and Laboratory-work. Strongly AgreeAgreeNot SureDisagreeStrongly Disagree 10. Evaluation of the course is appropriate to discriminate the students. Strongly AgreeAgreeNot SureDisagreeStrongly Disagree Recommendations for course improvement (Please specify topics that should be added/dropped from the course, new books to be recommended, changes in teaching scheme and experiments, etc. if any) 11+4=? Employer Feedback Faculty Details Department—Please choose an option—AI & Machine LearningAutomation & RoboticsComputer EngineeringElectronics & CommunicationCivil EngineeringMechanical EngineeringElectrical EngineeringScience & Humanities Academic Year—Please choose an option—2024-25 Semester—Please choose an option—Odd SemEven Sem Please provide the feedback in the range 1(Min.) to 5(Max.) Faculty Feedback 1. Aims and objectives of the syllabi are well defined and clear to teachers and students. Strongly AgreeAgreeNot SureDisagreeStrongly Disagree 2. The curriculum provides opportunity for the conducting project related activities. Strongly AgreeAgreeNot SureDisagreeStrongly Disagree 3. The depth of the course content is adequate to have significant learning outcomes. Strongly AgreeAgreeNot SureDisagreeStrongly Disagree 4. The opinion of the faculty members are taken in to account during curriculum revision. Strongly AgreeAgreeNot SureDisagreeStrongly Disagree 5. The learning outcomes of the curriculum are of local, national and global standard. Strongly AgreeAgreeNot SureDisagreeStrongly Disagree 6. The pre-requisite courses are appropriate for this course. Strongly AgreeAgreeNot SureDisagreeStrongly Disagree 7. The students attain the POs, COs and PSOs satisfactorily. Strongly AgreeAgreeNot SureDisagreeStrongly Disagree 8. The curriculum has the potential in developing the habit of self learning among the students. Strongly AgreeAgreeNot SureDisagreeStrongly Disagree 9. The course/syllabus has a good balance between theory and Laboratory-work. Strongly AgreeAgreeNot SureDisagreeStrongly Disagree 10. Evaluation of the course is appropriate to discriminate the students. Strongly AgreeAgreeNot SureDisagreeStrongly Disagree Recommendations for course improvement (Please specify topics that should be added/dropped from the course, new books to be recommended, changes in teaching scheme and experiments, etc. if any) 11+4=? Parent Feedback Faculty Details Department—Please choose an option—AI & Machine LearningAutomation & RoboticsComputer EngineeringElectronics & CommunicationCivil EngineeringMechanical EngineeringElectrical EngineeringScience & Humanities Academic Year—Please choose an option—2024-25 Semester—Please choose an option—Odd SemEven Sem Please provide the feedback in the range 1(Min.) to 5(Max.) Faculty Feedback 1. Aims and objectives of the syllabi are well defined and clear to teachers and students. Strongly AgreeAgreeNot SureDisagreeStrongly Disagree 2. The curriculum provides opportunity for the conducting project related activities. Strongly AgreeAgreeNot SureDisagreeStrongly Disagree 3. The depth of the course content is adequate to have significant learning outcomes. Strongly AgreeAgreeNot SureDisagreeStrongly Disagree 4. The opinion of the faculty members are taken in to account during curriculum revision. Strongly AgreeAgreeNot SureDisagreeStrongly Disagree 5. The learning outcomes of the curriculum are of local, national and global standard. Strongly AgreeAgreeNot SureDisagreeStrongly Disagree 6. The pre-requisite courses are appropriate for this course. Strongly AgreeAgreeNot SureDisagreeStrongly Disagree 7. The students attain the POs, COs and PSOs satisfactorily. Strongly AgreeAgreeNot SureDisagreeStrongly Disagree 8. The curriculum has the potential in developing the habit of self learning among the students. Strongly AgreeAgreeNot SureDisagreeStrongly Disagree 9. The course/syllabus has a good balance between theory and Laboratory-work. Strongly AgreeAgreeNot SureDisagreeStrongly Disagree 10. Evaluation of the course is appropriate to discriminate the students. Strongly AgreeAgreeNot SureDisagreeStrongly Disagree Recommendations for course improvement (Please specify topics that should be added/dropped from the course, new books to be recommended, changes in teaching scheme and experiments, etc. if any) 11+4=? Alumni Feedback Faculty Details Department—Please choose an option—AI & Machine LearningAutomation & RoboticsComputer EngineeringElectronics & CommunicationCivil EngineeringMechanical EngineeringElectrical EngineeringScience & Humanities Academic Year—Please choose an option—2024-25 Semester—Please choose an option—Odd SemEven Sem Please provide the feedback in the range 1(Min.) to 5(Max.) Faculty Feedback 1. Aims and objectives of the syllabi are well defined and clear to teachers and students. Strongly AgreeAgreeNot SureDisagreeStrongly Disagree 2. The curriculum provides opportunity for the conducting project related activities. Strongly AgreeAgreeNot SureDisagreeStrongly Disagree 3. The depth of the course content is adequate to have significant learning outcomes. Strongly AgreeAgreeNot SureDisagreeStrongly Disagree 4. The opinion of the faculty members are taken in to account during curriculum revision. Strongly AgreeAgreeNot SureDisagreeStrongly Disagree 5. The learning outcomes of the curriculum are of local, national and global standard. Strongly AgreeAgreeNot SureDisagreeStrongly Disagree 6. The pre-requisite courses are appropriate for this course. Strongly AgreeAgreeNot SureDisagreeStrongly Disagree 7. The students attain the POs, COs and PSOs satisfactorily. Strongly AgreeAgreeNot SureDisagreeStrongly Disagree 8. The curriculum has the potential in developing the habit of self learning among the students. Strongly AgreeAgreeNot SureDisagreeStrongly Disagree 9. The course/syllabus has a good balance between theory and Laboratory-work. Strongly AgreeAgreeNot SureDisagreeStrongly Disagree 10. Evaluation of the course is appropriate to discriminate the students. Strongly AgreeAgreeNot SureDisagreeStrongly Disagree Recommendations for course improvement (Please specify topics that should be added/dropped from the course, new books to be recommended, changes in teaching scheme and experiments, etc. if any) 11+4=?
